Close

New Jersey Employment Attorneys Blog

Updated:

A “SUGGESTED COURSE” OF ILLEGAL ACTION BY A SUPERIOR MAY SATISFY THE REASONABLE BELIEF STANDARD UNDER CEPA THAT LAW OR PUBLIC POLICY WAS VIOLATED BY THE EMPLOYER

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed, among other issues, the question of whether a “suggested course of action” by a supervisor to a subordinate can suffice as a reasonable belief under New Jersey’s whistleblower law that the supervisor wants the subordinate to engage in conduct that violates law or…

Updated:

ATTORNEYS WHO VIOLATE THE “GOLDEN RULE” WHEN CLOSING BEFORE A JURY AT TRIAL RISK THEIR CLIENTS LOSING HARD FOUGHT VERDICTS ON APPEAL

Attorneys who violate the “Golden Rule” when providing a closing summation to a jury at trial risk losing a verdict for their clients, so says the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division in Morgan v. Willie Maxwell II, et. al., 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 718 (decided April 26, 2021).…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT SAYS MEDICAL MARIJUANA CAN BE A REASONBLE AND NECESSARY TREATMENT FOR WORK RELATED INJURIES, AND THEREFORE, A REIMBURSABLE COST UNDER NEW JERSEY WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT

Vincent Hager suffered serious work-related back injuries on a construction job while working for M&K Construction. He underwent surgeries and was prescribed opioid medication for his chronic pain which did not provide him adequate relief. Hager then enrolled in New Jersey’s medical marijuana program for pain management and to overcome…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY WORKERS DO NOT NEED TO PROVE AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION TO PURSUE A FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE CLAIM UNDER THE LAD AND A WORKER SEEKING BODILY INJURY DAMAGES IS NOT BARRED BY OUR STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION LAWS FROM BRINGING SUCH AN ACTION UNDER THE LAD.

Although there is no bright-line rule as to what constitutes an adverse employment action, New Jersey state and federal courts have held that actions causing direct economic harm (such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, or adjusting wages or benefits) qualify as adverse actions sufficient to support a prima facie case of…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL A BROKEN VERBAL PROMISE OF EMPLOYMENT MAY ALLOW FOR A CLAIM FOR RELIANCE DAMAGES

Following a trial at the Law Division and an appeal to the Appellate Division, the New Jersey Supreme Court was asked to resolve whether a plaintiff could recover damages under a promissory estoppel theory of liability because he relied on defendant’s promise in quitting his prior employment. Goldfarb v. Solimine,…

Updated:

THE FEDERAL AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN PROVIDES A 100% COBRA SUBSIDY FOR THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1, 2021 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 FOR WORKERS INVOLUNTARILY DISCHARGED

The American Rescue Plan (ARP) signed into law by President Joe Biden provides plenty of benefits for those eligible including: a) $242 billion in relief payments such as Economic Impact Payment of up to $1,400 for individuals or $2,800 for married couples, plus $1,400 for each dependent; b) expansion of…

Updated:

PRETRIAL INCARCERATION DOES NOT NECESSARILY DISQUALIFY A CLAIMANT FROM RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS

In Haley v. Bd. of Review, DOL, 2021 N.J. LEXIS 223* (Decided March 17, 2021) our New Jersey Supreme Court held that pretrial detention is not an absolute bar to receiving unemployment compensation benefits for the time following dismissal of the criminal charges and release from detention. Based on the…

Updated:

THE THIRD CIRCUIT SAYS IT IS SUFFICIENT AT THE PLEADING STAGE FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN AN AGE DISCRIMINATION CASE TO MERELY ALLEGE HE WAS REPLACED BY SOMEONE “SIGNIFICANTLY YOUNGER” TO SURVIVE A MOTION TO DISMISS

Dr. Zeferino Martinez, a 70-year-old orthopedic surgeon, was fired in 2017 by UPMC Susquehanna, a Pennsylvania located hospital where he worked.  UPMC claimed Dr. Martinez was let go not because of his work performance, but rather because the hospital was “moving in a different direction and his services were no…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT MAKES CLEAR THAT UNEQUAL OR UNFAVORABLE TREATMENT OF PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING WOMEN IN THE WORKPLACE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED

Back on January 13, 2020 this blog site discussed a New Jersey Appellate Division decision interpreting the New Jersey Pregnant Workers’ Fairness Act (PWFA) which amended existing provisions of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) at N.J.S.A., 10:5-12(s) thereby requiring employers to provide pregnant (and breast feeding) workers with…

Updated:

EMPLOYEES MAY SUE UNDER NEW JERSEY’S WHISTLEBLOWING LAW IF THEY SUFFER AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION AFTER DISCLOSING, COMPLAINING OR OBJECTING ABOUT ANY ACTIVITY THEY REASONABLY BELIEVE VIOLATES NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY’S COVID-19 RELATED EXECUTIVE ORDERS

In Loeb v. Vantage Custom Classics, Inc., ESX-L-4762-20, the New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, was faced with the question of whether an employee who suffers an adverse employment action because of complaints he made to his employer about its failure to follow Governor Phil Murphy’s Executive Orders…

Contact Us