Mashel Law filed a Complaint in the Middlesex County Superior Court on behalf of a client, whose initials are Q.B., alleging she was constructively terminated by out of state defendants because of her protected whistleblowing activities in violation of New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA). Q.B. was hired by…
New Jersey Employment Attorneys Blog
NEW FEDERAL RULE ADOPTED ON WHETHER TO CLASSIFY A WORKER AS AN EMPLOYEE OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) final rule for determining whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) will take effect. 29 CFR part 795. FLSA establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping and child labor standards…
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE FILES LAWSUIT AGAINST TRUCKING COMPANIES ALLEGING THEY UNLAWFULLY MISCLASSIFIED HUNDREDS OF DRIVERS AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
Using enhanced powers provided by legislation signed by Governor Phil Murphy in 2020 and 2021 the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office recently filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) in the New Jerey Superior Court of Essex County on behalf the of the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Labor and…
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE RULES THAT NEW JERSEY’S WHISTLEBLOWING LAWS APPLY TO PROTECT AN OUT-OF-STATE EMPLOYEE WORKING REMOTELY FROM NORTH CAROLINA FOR A NEW JERSEY-BASED CORPORATION.
A legal question recently presented to the New Jersey Superior Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by a New Jersey based Defendant Corporation for answering was whether its former Plaintiff employee who worked remotely for it from her home in North Carolina was protected from an alleged unlawful retaliatory…
THE FEDERAL PREGNANT WORKERS FAIRNESS ACT AND THE NEW LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION REQUIRE NEW JERSEY EMPLOYERS TO PROVIDE THEIR PREGNANT OR POSTPARTUM WORKERS WITH REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) which came into effect earlier this summer requires employers to provide “reasonable accommodations” for pregnant and postpartum workers went into effect expanding protections for millions of people. The PWFA applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including hourly workers. In addition to covering pregnant…
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT RULES THAT CATHOLIC SCHOOL HAD THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DISCHARGE AN UNMARRIED TEACHER BECAUSE SHE BECAME PREGNANT AFTER ENGAGING IN PREMARTIAL SEX.
Can a Catholic Church which owns and operates a religious parochial school discharge one of its unmarried teachers because she became pregnant in violation of the Catholic Church’s teachings and her employment contract which both forbade engaging in premarital sex? In Crisitello v. St. Theresa School, 2023 N.J. LEXIS 847…
DISTRICT COURT RULES THAT AN OUT-OF-STATE EMPLOYEE OF A NEW JERSEY BASED COMPANY IS PROTECTED BY NEW JERSEY’S LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION
The New Jersey Supreme Court has yet to decide whether an out-of-state remote worker who worked for a New Jersey-based company is protected by New Jersey’s laws prohibiting workplace discrimination. This is why the New Jersey District Court for the District of New Jersey in Schulman v. Zoetis, Inc., 2023…
APPELLATE DIVISION RULES THAT A CONSTRUCTIVE DISCHARGE CLAIM UNDER CEPA MAY BE PURSUED WHERE AN EMPLOYER REPEATEDLY INSISTS OVER AN EMPLOYEE’S OBJECTIONS THAT SHE ENGAGE IN CONDUCT SHE REASONABLY BELIEVES VIOLATES THE LAW.
“A constructive discharge occurs when the employer has imposed upon an employee working conditions ‘so intolerable that a reasonable person subject to them would resign.'” Daniels v. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 340 N.J. Super. 11, 17 (App. Div. 2001) (quoting Muench v. Twp. of Haddon, 255 N.J. Super. 288, 302…
THE APPELLATE DIVISION SAYS YOU CANNOT GET YOUR AGE DISCRIMINATION CASE BEFORE A JURY IF AFTER BEING DISCHARGED YOUR WORK DUTIES ARE ASSIGNED TO A YOUNGER EXISTING WORKER RATHER THAN A YOUNGER PERSON BEING HIRED TO REPLACE YOU.
Plaintiff Kalloo, age 61, worked for New York New Jersey Rail, LLC (NYNJR) for some 13 years as a train engineer. He got into a physical altercation with a coworker who was only 23 years old. Witnesses seemed to corroborate that Kalloo was the instigator. Kalloo was terminated for cause…
NEW JERSEY FEDERAL COURT SAYS NO RIGHT TO SUE UNDER CREAMMA IF YOU ARE NOT HIRED DUE TO SMOKING OR INGESTING MARIJUANA
In a case of first impression, Judge O’Hearn of the United Stated District Court of the District of New Jersey (USDNJ) concluded that there is neither an express or implied cause of action under the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act (“CREAMMA”), N.J.S.A. 24:6I-52. Judge O’Hearn…