Close

New Jersey Employment Attorneys Blog

Updated:

THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND ITS STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL JOINTLY ISSUED GUIDANCE ON PROTECTIONS FOR REMOTE WORKERS UNDER NEW JERSEY’S LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION.

The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) prohibits employers from discriminating against employees by treating them hostilely or differently based on the employee’s race/color, sex/gender, age, national origin/ancestry, religion/creed, disability (temporary or permanent), sexual orientation, and gender identity, among other protected class characteristics. Earlier this year, the New Jersey Division…

Updated:

TRIAL COURT AGREES WITH MASHEL LAW THAT AN EMPLOYER’S FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE REQUIRING THEIR CLIENT’S DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS TO BE FILED ONLY IN TENNESSEE IS UNENFORCEABLE.

On behalf of a client, Mashel Law recently filed a multicount complaint in the New Jersey Superior Court alleging, inter. alia., that she as the Plaintiff/Employee, was the victim of a hostile work environment and disparate treatment because of her female gender which ultimately resulted in her retaliatory wrongful discharge…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISON SAYS TRIAL COURTS MUST VIEW WITH BROAD LIBERALITY CLAIMS OF DISABILITY BROUGHT UNDER NEW JERSEY’S LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION

To be considered to have a protected “disability” under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), one must show they have:                      1.   Any physical disability, infirmity, malformation or disfigurement                        …

Updated:

THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION ON CIVIL RIGHTS PROPOSES NEW RULES REGARDING DISPARATE IMPACT DISCRIMINATION

In the workplace the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) generally prohibits disparate (different) treatment of workers based on or motivated by their actual or perceived race, religion, disability, ancestry/national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, and other protected characteristics. Establishing a disparate treatment claim typically requires proof…

Updated:

THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN NON-DISPARAGEMENT CLAUSES IN DISCRIMINATION SETTLEMENTS

Non-disparagement clauses in settlement agreements are provisions designed to prohibit designated parties from making negative, critical, or disparaging statements about the releasing party or each other. Until recently these clauses were used in employment settlement agreements to prevent claimants from bad-mouthing former employers or associated parties, or more broadly, to…

Updated:

THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION TAKES THE MONUMENTAL STEP OF BANNING MOST NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS

Historically there has been an inherent imbalance of power between employers and employees in the workplace. Indeed, the employer-employee relationship in law used to be referred to as a “master-servant relationship”. www. law.cornell.edu. An example of this disparate power is found in noncompete agreements forced on employees which typically act…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY’S TEMPORARY WORKERS’ BILL OF RIGHTS PROVIDES COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTIONS FOR VULNERABLE TEMPORARY WORKERS

On February 6, 2023, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed into law the Temporary Workers’ Bill of Rights (“TWBR”) The enactment the TWBR marked a significant stride forward towards ensuring fair and just treatment for all New Jersey workers because it elevates labor standards and holds employers accountable. The TWBR…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY APPELLATE COURT SAYS EMPLOYEES MAY USE THE CONTINUING VIOLATION THEORY TO ALLOW A JURY TO HEAR MATERIAL FACTS THAT OCCUR OUTSIDE THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

Each claim brought against an employer has a statute of limitations which is the deadline for filing a lawsuit. Most lawsuits must be filed within a certain amount of time. In general, once the statute of limitations on a case expires the legal claim is no longer valid. However, a…

Updated:

APPELLATE DIVISION UNDERSCORES THE IMPORTANCE OF A CAUSAL NEXUS BEING ESTABLISHED IN CLAIMS BROUGHT UNDER NEW JERSEY’S CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT

A crucial element in proving a claim brought under the New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) is establishing a causal connection between the whistleblowing activity and the alleged resulting an adverse employment action (e.g., termination, suspension, demotion, denial of promotion, transfer, cut in pay, hostile work environment, etc.). In…

Updated:

NEW JERSEY JUDGE SAYS MASHEL LAW CLIENT WHO FILED A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT AGAINST HER FORMER EMPLOYER DOES NOT HAVE TO GO TO ARBITRATION

Earlier this month, Mashel Law defeated an attempt by a Defendant-Employer to dismiss our client’s whistleblowing lawsuit brought under New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) and compel it to be decided through forced private arbitration. Arbitration is where parties contractually agree to resolve legal disputes through a private method…

Contact Us